Council
Open to a pilot
For public affairs teams
Turn your team's knowledge into a strategic advantage.
MapStake brings together what your team knows about each stakeholder and issue: their position, your conversations and the regulatory context you have recorded.
MAPSTAKE IN ONE MINUTE
From a meeting or an external development to the context your team needs for its next move.
A fictional example connects an external development, a meeting note and a team commitment.
María López is linked to two issues: AI Act implementation and digital identity. Her position differs between them. Context is organised around the relationship between a stakeholder and an issue.
A meeting note records her concern about implementation costs. The illustrative interface shows AI proposals, supporting evidence and controls for human review and confirmation, without proposing a position change.
The sequence connects shared context to an action: sending practical examples, owned by the PA team and due next Friday. It closes with the invitation “Request a demo”.
Descriptive summary of the visual elements reviewed; not a verbatim voiceover transcript.
Before answering a client or preparing for a meeting, you need to gather notes, find past conversations and ask who knows what happened.
MapStake connects that knowledge to each issue so whoever takes the next step can pick up the context.
Orbe is advising Nubia Foods on a reusable-packaging proposal. MapStake brings together stakeholder positions, recorded concerns and relationship history to help the team prepare its recommendation.
Request a demoObjective: a workable rollout timetable for small businesses.
Open to a pilot
Opposes the rollout timetable
Key concernImplementation costs
Same association, different issue. Supports the mobility project.
Discuss a shared washing service to address the association’s cost concerns.
For team review · Not an automatic decisionSee each stakeholder’s importance, position and concerns on the issue you want to move forward.
Find the conversations and sources behind the next step you recommend.
Anyone taking over a relationship can see what was discussed, where things stand and what is still open.
MapStake turns what one person learns into knowledge the rest of the team can use.
The AI briefing brings together relationship context and relevant meetings.
Meeting-note analysis can propose updates and show the supporting evidence. This is an experimental workflow that we are still validating.
Illustrative evidence“We need to see the impact on costs before confirming our support.”
Your team reviews the proposal and decides whether to accept, amend or reject the update.
The demo covers an issue’s context and follow-up. We explain the scope of experimental features as we go.
Stakeholders, issues, relationships, meetings and AI briefings. A calendar with three views, plus actions with status and due dates.
Record signals with sources and review proposed updates. We distinguish documented evidence, interpretation and the team’s decision.
Google Calendar and Outlook sync, direct note imports and automated regulatory monitoring. The Granola guide already supports a manual workflow.
Give teams a shared view of each stakeholder’s position, open concerns and next step on a priority issue.
Retain what the team has learned and recover the context you need to explain a recommendation to your client.
See what each representative supports and the conditions they raise before preparing a shared position.
Choose a company, consultancy or association scenario. We’ll show how relationships, meetings and next steps connect. Experimental features are presented with their current scope.
We can walk through an issue and its relationships, record a meeting, open a briefing and review actions and the calendar. Each walkthrough reflects the case’s current functionality, with experimental features clearly identified.
The same person can be a decision-maker on one issue and an adviser on another. MapStake records their role, position and follow-up separately for each relationship.
A briefing brings together context for a conversation. In the experimental proposal workflow, the team reviews the evidence and decides whether to accept, amend or reject an update before it is applied.
You can record signals and link their sources for analysis in the context of an issue. Continuous monitoring and automatic alerts are still pending; regulatory examples in the demo are marked as experimental.
Yes. Request a demo and tell us the kind of issue your team follows. We can use a representative example without sharing confidential information.
MapStake links each meeting to an issue and the relationships involved. Its briefings bring together that context and the recorded meetings to help prepare the next conversation. The history stays organised by relationship, alongside the stakeholder’s position and the next step recorded by the team.
They can review each stakeholder’s position on that issue, the meeting notes and the next step recorded. This gives them the context left by the team to prepare the next conversation.
In the demo, we’ll look at the stakeholders, their positions and what your team needs to know before deciding its next step. We can use a fictional case without sharing confidential information.