MapStake
Menu
See the productUse cases
EspañolRequest a demo

For public affairs teams

Know who has influence.
Understand how.
Decide where to act.

Turn your team's knowledge into a strategic advantage.

MapStake brings together what your team knows about each stakeholder and issue: their position, your conversations and the regulatory context you have recorded.

MAPSTAKE IN ONE MINUTE

Every relationship. In context.

From a meeting or an external development to the context your team needs for its next move.

English · 1:01 · Subtitles included

Open the video separately

Read the video summary

A fictional example connects an external development, a meeting note and a team commitment.

María López is linked to two issues: AI Act implementation and digital identity. Her position differs between them. Context is organised around the relationship between a stakeholder and an issue.

A meeting note records her concern about implementation costs. The illustrative interface shows AI proposals, supporting evidence and controls for human review and confirmation, without proposing a position change.

The sequence connects shared context to an action: sending practical examples, owned by the PA team and due next Friday. It closes with the invitation “Request a demo”.

Descriptive summary of the visual elements reviewed; not a verbatim voiceover transcript.

Sound familiar?

Your next decision should not start with an inbox search.

Before answering a client or preparing for a meeting, you need to gather notes, find past conversations and ask who knows what happened.

MapStake connects that knowledge to each issue so whoever takes the next step can pick up the context.

A public affairs consultancy in action

Your client asks: “Who should we speak to first?”

Orbe is advising Nubia Foods on a reusable-packaging proposal. MapStake brings together stakeholder positions, recorded concerns and relationship history to help the team prepare its recommendation.

Request a demo
ConsultancyOrbe
ClientNubia Foods
Client issue

Reusable packaging

Objective: a workable rollout timetable for small businesses.

Council

Open to a pilot

Traders’ association

Opposes the rollout timetable

Key concernImplementation costs

Same association, different issue. Supports the mobility project.

Suggested next step

Discuss a shared washing service to address the association’s cost concerns.

For team review · Not an automatic decision
Illustrative scenario · Fictional consultancy, client and stakeholders.
01

Prioritise with context

See each stakeholder’s importance, position and concerns on the issue you want to move forward.

02

Explain your recommendations

Find the conversations and sources behind the next step you recommend.

03

Keep the work moving

Anyone taking over a relationship can see what was discussed, where things stand and what is still open.

Explore the featuresWhat you can try today

A closer look at the product

Stakeholders and issues
Organise the people and organisations that influence your priority issues.
Relationships by issue
Record the role, position, importance, context and next step for each relationship.
Linked meetings
Save notes and attendees, then link the meeting to the issue and the relationships involved.
AI briefings
Prepare for a conversation with relationship context and relevant meetings. Reopen previously saved briefings.
Calendar and actions
View meetings, deadlines and milestones in Week, Month or Agenda. Filter by issue and track the team’s actions.
Regulatory context
Record the signals and sources relevant to each issue. Automated regulatory monitoring is not yet available.
How it works

AI brings the context together. Your team decides.

MapStake turns what one person learns into knowledge the rest of the team can use.

01

Prepare the conversation

The AI briefing brings together relationship context and relevant meetings.

02

Review the evidence

Meeting-note analysis can propose updates and show the supporting evidence. This is an experimental workflow that we are still validating.

Illustrative evidence“We need to see the impact on costs before confirming our support.”
03

Decide what changes

Your team reviews the proposal and decides whether to accept, amend or reject the update.

What is available and what we are validatingProduct status

What you can use and what we are validating

The demo covers an issue’s context and follow-up. We explain the scope of experimental features as we go.

Available

Context and follow-up

Stakeholders, issues, relationships, meetings and AI briefings. A calendar with three views, plus actions with status and due dates.

Experimental

Evidence and proposals

Record signals with sources and review proposed updates. We distinguish documented evidence, interpretation and the team’s decision.

In preparation

Automatic connections

Google Calendar and Outlook sync, direct note imports and automated regulatory monitoring. The Granola guide already supports a manual workflow.

Who it is for

The context each team needs

Companies

Coordinate a response

Give teams a shared view of each stakeholder’s position, open concerns and next step on a priority issue.

Consultancies

Keep every account moving

Retain what the team has learned and recover the context you need to explain a recommendation to your client.

Associations

Understand your members

See what each representative supports and the conditions they raise before preparing a shared position.

Guided demo

Now picture it on an issue your team is working on.

Choose a company, consultancy or association scenario. We’ll show how relationships, meetings and next steps connect. Experimental features are presented with their current scope.

Frequently asked questions

Before you get started

What can I see in a demo?

We can walk through an issue and its relationships, record a meeting, open a briefing and review actions and the calendar. Each walkthrough reflects the case’s current functionality, with experimental features clearly identified.

How is it different from a contact CRM?

The same person can be a decision-maker on one issue and an adviser on another. MapStake records their role, position and follow-up separately for each relationship.

Does AI change the records?

A briefing brings together context for a conversation. In the experimental proposal workflow, the team reviews the evidence and decides whether to accept, amend or reject an update before it is applied.

Does it automatically monitor regulatory changes?

You can record signals and link their sources for analysis in the context of an issue. Continuous monitoring and automatic alerts are still pending; regulatory examples in the demo are marked as experimental.

Can we use an issue from our sector?

Yes. Request a demo and tell us the kind of issue your team follows. We can use a representative example without sharing confidential information.

What does MapStake add if we already use ChatGPT and shared documents?

MapStake links each meeting to an issue and the relationships involved. Its briefings bring together that context and the recorded meetings to help prepare the next conversation. The history stays organised by relationship, alongside the stakeholder’s position and the next step recorded by the team.

What happens when someone else on the team takes over an issue?

They can review each stakeholder’s position on that issue, the meeting notes and the next step recorded. This gives them the context left by the team to prepare the next conversation.

Let’s explore an issue from your sector.

In the demo, we’ll look at the stakeholders, their positions and what your team needs to know before deciding its next step. We can use a fictional case without sharing confidential information.